🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to protect females from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop laws and support services to end all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both within the country and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a national appeal demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for further review if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in other member states